Quantcast
Channel: AsiaOne - Singapore
Viewing all 5962 articles
Browse latest View live

AMK patient had latent TB but stopped preventive treatment

$
0
0

When Mr Effandy Rahmat was diagnosed with latent tuberculosis (TB) in May last year, he was told to go to a polyclinic every day for preventive treatment.

But his work shifts as a waiter made the clinic visits challenging. Worse, the medication had side effects - it gave him rashes and made him cough up blood. He stopped going after two weeks.

That proved to be a costly mistake. In October, the 25-year-old was diagnosed with multi-drug-resistant TB and is still in hospital getting treatment.

He is one of six people living in a housing block in Ang Mo Kio Avenue 3 who were diagnosed with the same strain of drug-resistant TB over a four-year period.

"At that time, I had no clue what TB was," said Mr Effandy, explaining why he stopped going for treatment.

"They told me that the symptoms are weight loss, appetite loss and a prolonged cough, but I had none except the cough. My body was totally normal."

Even the cough was not a concern, he noted, since he had been a smoker from the age of 18.

Latent TB is not uncommon here and is estimated to affect between 2 per cent and 29 per cent of Singaporeans. Someone with a latent infection does not have symptoms or feel sick, and cannot spread TB to others.

But one in 10 will eventually develop an active form of the disease.

Chinese evening daily Lianhe Wanbao reported that Mr Effandy's mother and brother have been screened for the disease and cleared.

Madam Susi Nander, Mr Effandy's mother, said he was allowed to return home for three hours last month to celebrate his younger brother's birthday.

The 49-year-old cleaner added: "Hari Raya is coming, I want to celebrate together (with him), but I don't know (whether) can or not.".


This article was first published on Jun 18, 2016.
Get a copy of The Straits Times or go to straitstimes.com for more stories.

Image: 
Publication Date: 
Saturday, June 18, 2016 - 15:00
Keywords: 
Send to mobile app: 
Source: 
Story Type: 
Others

Fewer MRT disruptions in first quarter, LTA data shows

$
0
0

Singapore's rail system continued to improve on the whole in the first quarter, even if the absolute number of major breakdowns remained high.

According to statistics released by the Land Transport Authority (LTA) yesterday, the MRT network had one disruption for every 159,000 train-km clocked - compared with one every 133,000 train-km at the end of last year.

Incidents are tallied if they delay journeys by more than five minutes.

As for the absolute number of longer disruptions - in particular those lasting more than 30 minutes - there were four on the MRT network in the first three months, and another four on the LRT network, bringing the total to eight.

For the whole of last year, there were 29 incidents for the entire rail network, which worked out to an average of 7.25 per quarter.

On this front, operator SBS Transit scored well, with no major disruption on its North-East and Downtown lines.

However, the North-East Line was the worst performer when shorter delays were included. The line chalked up one incident for every 93,000 train-km in the first quarter - up sharply from one in 213,000 train-km as of end-2015.

Its Downtown Line fared much better, chalking up one incident per 171,000 train-km - down from one in 45,000 train-km at the end of last year. This was largely because Stage 2 of the line opened in December, leading to longer distances clocked by brand-new trains, which are less likely to break down.

On the LRT front, the overall network clocked one incident for every 43,000 car-km travelled - down from one every 42,000 car- km at the end of last year. The LTA said it uses car-km as a measure for the LRT as the system uses a mix of one- and two-car trains.

National University of Singapore transport researcher Lee Der-Horng said the rail system is facing "new challenges" from its power systems, which have lately contributed increasingly to major breakdowns. "I do not know if there are even deeper root causes (of breakdowns) in our system which may prevent us from having a reliable MRT," he said.

Commuters interviewed, however, said they had noticed a slight improvement.

Finance analyst Kat Lee, 30, said she now encounters a minor glitch every two to three weeks on average - down from once a week.

Typical glitches, she said, would include trains stopping "in between stations for around five minutes".

Remisier Thomas Tay, 56, said he had noticed fewer incidents involving train doors that open and close several times before they are finally closed. "It still happens, but not as often," he said, adding that he was caught in only one major disruption in the first quarter.

In comparison, Hong Kong's MTR had three major glitches in the first quarter. Including minor glitches, it had one incident for every 520,000 train-km.


This article was first published on Jun 18, 2016.
Get a copy of The Straits Times or go to straitstimes.com for more stories.

Image: 
Category: 
Publication Date: 
Saturday, June 18, 2016 - 15:00
Keywords: 
Send to mobile app: 
Source: 
Story Type: 
Others

Local firm wins $418m MRT contract

$
0
0

The contract to build the Sungei Bedok MRT station and its associated tunnels was awarded yesterday to local firm KTC Civil Engineering and Construction for $418 million.

KTC is also involved in the construction of Tampines station on the Downtown Line 3, and Orchard Boulevard station on the Thomson-East Coast Line (TEL).

The Sungei Bedok station is the last major civil contract for the 13km East Coast stretch of the 43km-long TEL, said the Land Transport Authority (LTA).

With this contract, LTA "has appointed contractors for all the nine stations of the East Coast stretch of TEL, at a total cost of approximately $2.73 billion", said its chief executive Chew Men Leong. " Works will now be in full swing."

Located in Upper East Coast Road near Bedok Food Centre, the Sungei Bedok station is expected to be completed in 2024, and will be an interchange station connecting the TEL and the Downtown Line.

"This will help redistribute and relieve train loading on the East-West Line, resulting in more comfortable rides for commuters," said the LTA.

The station will also serve as one of seven civil defence shelters on the East Coast stretch of the TEL, joining stations such as Bayshore, Marine Parade and Siglap.

The East Coast stretch of the TEL will be completed in two stages, with the first seven stations from Tanjong Rhu to Bayshore expected to be ready by 2023, while the remaining two stations will be completed the following year.

The 30km-long Thomson stretch of the line, covering 22 stations between Woodlands North and Gardens by the Bay, will open in three stages from 2019 and is expected to be completed by 2021.

Six stations along the stretch, including Woodlands and Orchard stations, will intersect with other MRT lines and serve as interchanges.


This article was first published on Jun 18, 2016.
Get a copy of The Straits Times or go to straitstimes.com for more stories.

Image: 
Category: 
Publication Date: 
Saturday, June 18, 2016 - 16:00
Keywords: 
Send to mobile app: 
Source: 
Story Type: 
Others

Cancer did not stop Singapore's rhythmic gymnastics coach

$
0
0

Taking pride of place in the living room of a four-room flat in Sengkang are a thousand paper cranes strung and hung over a television.

Painstakingly made three years ago by Singapore's rhythmic gymnasts, the origami cranes were meant for their coach Zhu Xiaoping, or "Zhu lao shi", as she is affectionately known.

Unrelenting in her training, authoritative yet not authoritarian, she is beloved by her gymnasts. The cranes, or senbazuru, have their roots in a Japanese legend that grants a wish from the heavens to one who folds a thousand cranes.

Today, Zhu is unsure if there will even be a tomorrow. Suffering from Stage 4 colon cancer, her doctor could not tell her if she will recover or how much time she has left.

But even as she grew weak from the illness, her dedication and commitment to her sport never wavered as she guided the Singapore team to a first-ever gold in last year's SEA Games group all-around competition.

"I'm not somebody who can tell when my body needs to rest, and I'm very focused, so I find it difficult to slack off. It's as if I've sold my life to the sport," said the 56-year-old in Mandarin, whose hair is thinning from chemotherapy but still sounded full of energy.

For her selfless dedication, Zhu will be one of two recipients - along with marathoner Ashley Liew - of a special award at the Singapore Sports Awards next Thursday.

Minister for Social and Family Development and Singapore National Olympic Council president Tan Chuan-Jin visited Zhu at her home yesterday morning and praised her.

He said: "Coach Zhu Xiaoping put her athletes and Singapore Gymnastics' interests above her own health and served selflessly to help them prepare for the 28th SEA Games. Her dedication to sport is admirable."

When Zhu was first diagnosed with cancer, it had already spread to her liver and lymph nodes. But she felt compelled to help the gymnasts when their coach left abruptly in December 2014 for personal reasons as it was only six months to go before the Games.

Unfazed by the task of preparing the athletes within a short span of time, the Jiangxi native led the girls in training up to six times a week in the lead-up to the Games.

The intensive sessions bore fruit when the historic gold was won and she was given the job permanently.

However, the cancer spread to parts of her womb and stomach lining last July.

"How could I be happy? I felt that my condition had worsened so I was prepared for it. I decided to treat it like the flu. Now I live every day like it's my last," said Zhu.

Ann Sim, who was part of the gold-winning team and had been trained by Zhu since 2007, remembers how the coach tried her best not to let her condition affect her handling of the team.

"Her stamina during training was different, but the standards she demanded from us remained the same," said the 21-year old student.

"Her style and attitude did not change, and she was always very dedicated to the sport and strict with us during training."

Zhu's love for the sport and her athletes is apparent when one walks around the Sengkang flat she shares with husband Lin Zhenqiu and their 28-year-old daughter.

Lining multiple walls of the flat are numerous photographs from her time as a coach, from the beginning of her career in China at the age of 20, to her arrival here in 2007, and to the first Youth Olympic Games in 2010, when she led Singapore to a fifth-place finish in the group all-around event.

Lin was the national coach of Singapore's men's artistic gymnastics team, but his contract was not renewed upon expiring last month.

"It pains me to see him at home without anything to do, because he was doing a fine job coaching the men's team and they won five medals at last year's SEA Games. Now we have no income so we have to rely on our savings," she lamented.

Choy Kah Kin, the president of Singapore Gymnastics, said the association is "exploring job opportunities" for Lin to assist the couple as they "have contributed a lot".

Zhu will be undergoing a more intensive round of chemotherapy in two weeks.

To pass her time, she plays with her neighbours' children every morning while occasionally knitting plush toys. Despite not coaching them any more, she also meets her gymnasts for meals.

She said: "It's difficult for me now that I cannot work, and my days are probably numbered.

"For us coaches, the sport is always the most important. But at the end of the day, there's nothing you can do without a healthy body. All your dreams will be meaningless without it."

kenggene@sph.com.sg


This article was first published on June 18, 2016.
Get a copy of The Straits Times or go to straitstimes.com for more stories.

Image: 
Category: 
Publication Date: 
Saturday, June 18, 2016 - 17:00
Send to mobile app: 
Source: 
Story Type: 
Others

Heavy rain causes commuters to be stranded in flooded bus

$
0
0

SINGAPORE - The Singapore Civil Defence Force (SCDF) had to be called in after waist-high flash floods caused some bus commuters to be stranded at Enterprise Road on Friday (June 17) afternoon.

Facebook user Thessa Huiying, who was travelling on bus service 252 at the time, wrote that water rose rapidly within a span of 10 minutes.

She posted photos of the flooded bus and road, as well as videos that show lorries driving through the murky water despite being partially submerged.

In her post, she thanked the bus captain for choosing to stop the vehicle, adding that he apologised to commuters for the delay even though he did not need to.

on Facebook

[Can someone please help me tag SBS and SCDF? I suck at this 󾌴 Thanks!] This is another video I took of the flood...

Posted by Thessa Huìyīng on Friday, 17 June 2016

She also thanked the SCDF for checking on the commuters and reassuring them. One Malay officer even joked with an elderly man in Chinese to lighten the mood, she said.

on Facebook

I'm stuck in the bus flooded by the heavy downpour. Now bus is on stationary and water is rising rapidly. I hope I make it out alive 󾌴󾌴󾌴

Posted by Thessa Huìyīng on Friday, 17 June 2016

In a Facebook post, SCDF said that other vehicles were also stalled in the flood.

After receiving an alert on the floods at 4.30pm, the SCDF helped to evacuate a total of 11 people in life vests.

There were no reported injuries.

ljessica@sph.com.sg

Image: 
Category: 
Publication Date: 
Saturday, June 18, 2016 - 12:54
Send to mobile app: 
Source: 
Rotator Image: 
Story Type: 
Others

Sembawang: Gateway to Singapore's WWII past

$
0
0

In a quiet, forested area near the coast in Sembawang lies a 1950s or 1960s covered gateway supported by two brick lamp posts.

The gateway, located at a clearing in Jalan Mempurong off Andrews Avenue, was most likely the entrance to the seaside bungalow of the late Cycle & Carriage boss Chua Boon Peng, who in 1951 clinched the Mercedes-Benz sole distributorship for what was then Malaya.

Architect Alisdair Ferrie, 60, whose father James bought a property in the area in 1979, said there were four bungalows in total.

The Ferries sold theirs before the Government acquired the land more than a decade later.

All the homes are now gone, but the gate reminds one of a time when living by the sea did not come with a multimillion-dollar price tag, said heritage blogger and naval architect Jerome Lim, who has mapped the area's historic naval and military structures.

He said seafront homes were not restricted to Europeans but also included a sprawling network of at least five villages such as Kampung Wak Hassan.

The National Heritage Board (NHB) told The Sunday Times it is now conducting additional research into the area to refresh its heritage trail of Yishun and Sembawang.

The board said it will be expanding content on the World War II structures found in Sembawang, once home to the British naval base.

To support the naval base, which was constructed to defend Singapore in 1938, surrounding structures including more than a dozen World War II bunkers, air-raid shelters and storehouses were built.

They are likely to be part of a complex and yet-to-be-discovered underground network.

Remnants and hints of their existence are hidden under Semba- wang's hilly terrain.

They include two partially exposed pillboxes in Bermuda Road, complete with ditches.

The pillboxes had slots for machine guns.

A more well-known structure is the air-raid shelter on the grounds of Admiralty House, now gazetted as a national monument.

Yet another underground shelter sits at 291 Durban Road. Evidence of its existence comes from the two ventilation shafts sticking out of the ground; what lies underneath is unclear.

NHB said its existing Yishun-Sembawang heritage trail features military-related structures such as St Andrew's Community Chapel, built by the British Royal Navy, a concrete bunker now engulfed by a banyan tree, the former Singapore Naval Base, and streets related to the Royal Navy.

NHB assistant chief executive of policy and community Alvin Tan said the board will be including new and updated information about Sembawang in its trail brochure, map and mobile app when the refreshed trail is launched.

Other significant and little-known buildings in Sembawang include a one-storey wooden building at 318-2 Gibraltar Crescent.

It used to be called the Japanese theatre, and there are differing accounts of what it was.

Some say it might have been used to screen propaganda films during the war.

Others suggest it was built after the war by Japanese prisoners-of-war (POWs).

Mr Lim hopes the NHB study can shed more light on the area's historic structures.

He said: "Sembawang has retained most of its original landscape, compared with the rest of the country. It deserves our recognition as it played a role in Singapore's development, offering employment for locals at the naval base.

"It has a unique identity that integrates nature with history and has an old-world feel to it."

Sembawang is also home to about 50 black-and-white buildings that are managed by the Singapore Land Authority (SLA).

Some of them used to house senior officers of the dockyard.

The homes have balconies and were often located on higher ground to offer a vantage point and lookout into the dock.

Among them is the house of the Commodore Superintendent of the Dockyard at 128 King's Avenue.

On its lawn lies an ornamental red bridge that was built by Japanese POWs after World War II, said Mr Lim.

This building is currently leased for residential use.

An SLA spokesman added that plans for 318-2 Gibraltar Crescent are currently under study.

The roads in the area were also named after former British colonies and existing territories such as Lagos, Delhi, Canberra, Bermuda and Pakistan.

A former navy man, Briton David Ayres, 71, who was based in Singapore for three years in the 1960s, shared stories of the area with The Sunday Times when he returned to Singapore last month for his first visit in decades.

He said there had been a milk bar on the naval base. "It was a little shop with a juke box that sold drinks such as Fraser and Neave's orange soda," he said.

Mr Ayres also documented 1960s Sembawang on his Miranda SLR film camera.

Among his pictures is one of the Aggie Weston Sailors' Rest - a recreation centre just outside the dockyard in Canberra Road where navy folk unwound. It had a swimming pool and fitness centre.

It still stands today as HomeTeamNS Sembawang Clubhouse.

Mr Ayres also captured local dockyard workers exiting the gates of Sembawang Road and riding home on their bicycles as the siren from the shipyard sounded to signal the end of the day.

This scene is still repeated in Canberra Road in the evenings today as Sembawang Shipyard workers ride home on their bicycles, although the road has become a dual carriageway.

melodyz@sph.com.sg


This article was first published on June 19, 2016.
Get a copy of The Straits Times or go to straitstimes.com for more stories.

Image: 
Category: 
Publication Date: 
Sunday, June 19, 2016 - 15:15
Keywords: 
Send to mobile app: 
Source: 
Story Type: 
Others

Husband leaped to death with son: She taps into grief to help others heal

$
0
0

Ms Aneez Fathima is momentarily stumped when she cannot remember the name of the college where her late husband graduated with a degree in computer science.

"I'm starting to forget him," she says, her eyes turning teary.

"For seven years, I couldn't forget him. My counsellors and friends have been telling me to bury him but it's so hard," says the 39-year-old.

Their advice is understandable, for Mr Mohamed Farook left her in the most painful manner.

On April 24, 2009, the then 36-year-old jumped off a block in Bukit Batok East Avenue 3, taking with him their only child Faheem, seven.

In suicide notes he left behind, the software engineer said he did it because of health problems and he wanted to spare his wife the burden of bringing up Faheem, who was autistic.

The tragedy upended Ms Aneez's life, turning her into an emotional wreck.

It took six long years before her faith and loved ones pulled her out of her pit of paralysing misery.

Today, she channels her grief into helping others.

She works as a para counsellor at Club Heal, a charity offering rehabilitation and counselling services to those suffering from mental illness.

Her biggest dream, however, is to start an initiative giving emotional and psychological support for caregivers with autistic children.

Shy but bubbly, the 1.68m English Literature graduate was born the youngest of three children in Thuckalay, a town in Tamil Nadu, India.

Her late father was a public servant and her mother, a housewife.

"My father was very loving but very strict. He was a very religious man. He never took us to the cinema, and there was no TV at home although there were a lot of books and magazines," says Ms Aneez who shied away from the company of boys when she was growing up.

"The only men I knew were my father and brother-in-law. My father didn't even allow me to talk to some of my male cousins."

After obtaining her Higher Secondary School Certificate - India's equivalent of the A levels - she read English Literature at the Sree Ayyappa College for Women.

Her father was keen on her pursuing her master's degree when she graduated, but again at a women's college.

However, her brother- in-law, who is a senior civil servant as well as a poet and writer, encouraged her to do it at a co-ed university. "He said he would take care of my father who respected him a lot," she says.

That was how she ended up at Scott Christian College in Nagercoil.

"My father said: 'If I hear of you doing anything with boys, I will stop your studies'," she recalls with a giggle. "I was already 22 but it took me three months before I could talk to a boy. I was so shy."

An attempt to find her a suitable husband fell through after she graduated, so her father sent her to Kerala instead to sit the highly competitive Civil Services Examination.

Known as the "mother of all examinations", it determines who is good enough to get into the premier Indian Administrative Service.

Ms Aneez took nine months to prepare for the exam, as well as another one set by the University Grants Commission which would allow her to teach at an Indian university.

She did not make it through the first, but passed the second.

While waiting for the results for both exams, she secured a lecturin

g job with the Muslim Arts College in Thiruvithancode, a small town in Tamil Nadu.

But she gave it up barely six months into the job: A suitable groom had been found for her.

The marriage proposal came through a family friend. Ms Aneez's sister and brother-in-law travelled 400km to Jegathapattinam to check out Mr Mohamed Farook, a software engineer then working for Seagate, an American data storage company, in Singapore.

Except for a barely discernible upward curve on the left corner of his mouth, Mr Mohamed Farook received a glowing report from her sister.

She says: "My sister said he had a good smile and seemed to be a good man from the way he behaved with his parents. She liked him."

His background was a good match too.

A computer science graduate from the Adhiyamaan College of Engineering, he had worked in Chennai and Muscat in Oman before Singapore.

"My brother-in-law also told me he probably didn't smoke because he had very rosy lips. I was very happy to hear that because I prayed for a man of good character: not a rich man or a handsome man but a man with no bad habits."

The marriage was arranged within a week, and took place on Valentine's Day in 2001.

They spent five days together before he came back to Singapore to work.

"I was supposed to come with him but my passport was not ready. I had to wait another month but he would call me every day and I would cry," she says.

In March 2001, she finally arrived in Singapore. Home was a flat in Bukit Batok shared with her husband's elder brother and his wife.

Plans for her to get a job were abandoned when she got pregnant four months later.

Because her pregnancy was a difficult one, she went back to India where her mother could look after her.

"My mother could not come to Singapore because my father was not well," says Ms Aneez who gave birth to Faheem in India in April 2002.

Mother and son returned to Singapore six months later.

All was well at first.

Faheem was a chubby baby who skipped crawling and started walking when he was nine months old.

"I thought it was a miracle. He could also say several words like milk and mama," she says.

In 2003 when Ms Aneez's father died, her mother came to visit.

"My mother noticed that he was not listening and didn't make eye contact. He was hyperactive, liked to throw things at people and it was hard to make him eat. She was concerned," she recalls.

After their son turned two, she and her husband sent him for various assessments all over Singapore and in India.

The couple were told that Faheem had developmental delay problems.

Ms Aneez threw herself into helping her son.

She sent him for Eipic (Early Intervention Programme for Infants and Young Children) as well as speech, occupational and social therapy.

She even learnt yoga so that she could teach him when she heard that yoga could help children with special needs.

Although these helped to calm him somewhat, he was deemed too disruptive for several childcare centres, which told his parents they could not admit him.

When he was seven, Faheem was officially diagnosed as having Asperger's syndrome, which is on the high functioning end of the autism spectrum.

Asperger children have difficulty with social interaction, have restricted interests and are prone to repetitive behaviour.

A psychiatrist suggested that he be enrolled at Bukit View Primary School, which had resources for a special needs teacher.

"It was heartbreaking to hear other kids calling him mad or stupid because he was not stupid. He was very good in Tamil and spelling and could spell 'stethoscope' when he was six," she says.

His behaviour in school stressed her out. "'You're Faheem's mother? Faheem did this, Faheem did that.' I'd get complaints from parents, pupils and teachers all the time," says Ms Aneez, adding that the lack of understanding and emotional support often reduced her to tears.

She had a meltdown one day when she was summoned to school.

Faheem - after completing his Tamil test accurately and in record time - had gone around disturbing his classmates, and even poked one of them with a pair of scissors.

She took him home and cried her heart out.

A couple of days later, on a Friday, she received a call from the school to take her son home.

She was told she needed to take him out of school.

Her husband returned home to comfort her. "He told me to be patient and to give him three months because he was working with a US-based company. He said he would ask for a transfer to the US so that our son could get better help," she recalls.

He then told her to rest, and that he would take Faheem to the mosque.

"I told him not to because people would ask why Faheem was not in school and I didn't want him to lie on Friday, a holy day.

He then said he would go and buy briyani," she says.

When father and son did not return after a while and her husband did not return her calls, she set out to look for them.

That was when she found out that her husband and son had fallen from the 24th floor of a housing block.

She became hysterical and inconsolable, and was admitted to Alexandra Hospital where she had to be sedated and tied to her bed.

Police later found several suicide notes in his desk addressed to his wife and siblings.

Besides giving her instructions on property and financial matters, he also told her to be brave and remarry.

"He said that he had chest pains and if something happened to him, things would get difficult for me so he wanted to take Faheem with him. I don't believe it; I don't think he had chest pains," she says quietly.

The trauma was so debilitating that she had to see a psychiatrist and be on anti-depressants for several months.

To forget the past, she worked as a trainer in a recruitment company for more than a year.

Because she could not shake off the pain, she returned to India where she spent two years with her family.

The love and support of her family and her faith brought her back from the brink.

When she received a letter from the HDB telling her that she could not rent out her flat, she saw that as a sign.

In October 2013, she returned to Singapore. She started taking religious classes and also began volunteering at Darul-Arqam, the Muslim Converts Association of Singapore.

There, she met pharmacist Siti Maimunah who she credits for helping to turn her life around.

Madam Siti says: "I got her to tell me her story only after a while. I could feel her pain. She had such a deep love for her husband but I told her that no man in his right mind would do what he did to her.

"She said that if anyone else had told her that, she would have punched them. I told her that maybe God wants her to use her pain to help others."

The pharmacist took her to attend a workshop at Club Heal. One thing led to another.

Ms Aneez started as a healing friend at the charity and felt so at home that she took a counselling course.

Today, she is a full-time para counsellor.

"When I came to Club Heal, I could understand the feelings of those struggling with mental illness. They have to fight stigma; they want love and affection. I told myself: 'This is my place. This is where I should be helping'," says Ms Aneez, who shared her story at an autism symposium earlier this year.

But her job, she says, is not done. She hopes to learn more about autism and take up courses to help caregivers of autistic children. "I want to give them the emotional and caregiving support I didn't have."

kimhoh@sph.com.sg


This article was first published on June 19, 2016.
Get a copy of The Straits Times or go to straitstimes.com for more stories.

HELPLINES
Samaritans of Singapore (SOS):1800-2214444
Singapore Association for Mental Health:1800-2837019
Sage Counselling Centre:1800-5555555
Care Corner Mandarin Counselling:1800-3535800
Image: 
Category: 
Publication Date: 
Sunday, June 19, 2016 - 15:34
Keywords: 
Send to mobile app: 
Source: 
Story Type: 
Others

Zero tolerance for hate speech, says Shanmugam

$
0
0

Inflammatory comments on race and religion have no place in Singapore, and the Government will continue to have zero tolerance against such divisive statements.

Describing Singapore's racial and religious harmony as "fragile, but precious", Home Affairs and Law Minister K. Shanmugam said yesterday that the country needed to reject intolerant teachings, and continue to strengthen trust and understanding between its communities.

He was speaking to reporters before the iftar at the Chong Pang Community Club yesterday, where more than 400 residents broke fast together.

He explained that Muslim communities both here and abroad were concerned by the rhetoric from US presidential hopeful Donald Trump.

Just last week, a senior Muslim cleric had asked him what he thought about the presumptive Republican nominee's comments.

"They are concerned as to what is happening," said Mr Shanmugam, who is an MP for Nee Soon GRC.

Mr Trump renewed his anti-Muslim campaign in the wake of last Sunday's shooting at a gay nightclub in Orlando, Florida, in which 49 people were killed and 53 injured.

The gunman, Omar Mateen, a US citizen, allegedly pledged allegiance to the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria during the massacre.

Last Monday, Mr Trump responded to the attack by repeating his call for a temporary ban on Muslims entering the country and for certain mosques to be put under surveillance.

"This is a major figure, a presidential candidate, who is saying these things," said Mr Shanmugam, who also pointed to the rise in the use of anti-Islamic rhetoric by extremist parties in Europe.

"Why was it said? For political benefit, pure and simple. If there are votes in it, people will do it."

But playing on race and religion for political profit and stoking fears is "really unacceptable and I think morally reprehensible", he added.

"Muslims as a group were characterised negatively. Islam was equated with terror... People aspiring to leadership positions should not do this - dividing their societies and alienating their Muslim communities."

Last month, US President Barack Obama also criticised Mr Trump at the Group of Seven summit in Japan, pointing out how world leaders had been rattled by him.

"A lot of the proposals he has made display either ignorance of world affairs, or a cavalier attitude, or an interest in getting tweets and headlines, instead of actually thinking through what is required to keep America safe and secure and prosperous, and what's required to keep the world on an even keel," he said.

What is happening in the US and Europe shows how quickly political debate can go along racial and religious lines, said Mr Shanmugam.

"In the US, their idea of free speech means you can burn the Quran, attack Muslims, attack others. Here we have zero tolerance for people who make bigoted, divisive statements," he added.

"If a person makes such statements, the ISD (Internal Security Department) will talk to him, and where necessary take further action. You burn the Quran, or any other holy book, you go to jail - no two ways about it...

"We have built something precious, fragile but precious. And we try hard to strengthen trust, deepen understanding between the races, religions, and reject religiously intolerant teachings."

dansonc@sph.com.sg


This article was first published on June 19, 2016.
Get a copy of The Straits Times or go to straitstimes.com for more stories.

Image: 
Category: 
Publication Date: 
Sunday, June 19, 2016 - 17:00
Keywords: 
Send to mobile app: 
Source: 
Story Type: 
Others

Father's Day special: Pioneer acrobatic cyclist's photo a heritage boon

$
0
0

Mr Chia Kum Loke, 74, has a photo album that he likes taking out at family gatherings to show off - in it are pictures of him and his wife dating in their younger days.

But the pictures that have really wowed the younger members of his family are those of Mr Chia performing gravity-defying stunts on bicycles, said his daughter Judy, 37, a media presenter.

In his glory days, the now-wizened Mr Chia was part of the Kong Chow Clan Acrobatic Cycling Troupe, one of the best known troupes of its kind here in the 1980s.

The Kong Chow Wui Koon or clan association is a Cantonese clan group based in Chinatown, and one of the oldest clan groups here.

The clan's acrobatic troupe, which was formed in 1957, trained more than 100 acrobatic cyclists over three decades.

They would perform at the National Day Parade, Chingay procession and other charity and community events.

The pictures have recently been loaned by the family to the National Heritage Board (NHB), where they have been digitised for posterity.

Tomorrow, they will be uploaded on the NHB's roots.sg portal - a website on Singapore's heritage and history.

Speaking to The Sunday Times, Ms Chia said the family decided to hand the pictures to the NHB because they felt the photos were a part of Singapore's heritage.

"My dad was one of the pioneering members of this acrobatic troupe, and these photographs will serve as a great memory for the next generation," she said on her father's behalf as he has Parkinson's disease and cannot speak.

Despite this, Mr Chia perked up when looking at his old pictures with The Sunday Times in his three-room flat in Bendemeer yesterday.

Pointing to a picture of himself sitting on the handlebars of a bicycle perched atop two short ladders, he laughed as he savoured the memory.

His wife, Madam Ong Sui Kim, 62, a housewife, said this stunt was particularly difficult because the bicycle would keep moving.

Said Ms Chia: "My father always said it was important to learn how to fall safely - so each time you fall, you can get up and continue training."

Mr Chia joined the troupe when he was 15 and mastered all of the 20 or so acrobatic stunts that involved both unicycles and regular bicycles.

He would train in his spare time, after he finished his day-time work as a welder.

One of the most difficult routines was "Pile-up Arts", where nine men would clamber one atop the other in a pyramid formation on a single moving bicycle.

The Kong Chow Clan Acrobatic Cycling Troupe disbanded in the 1990s after young people here lost interest in the acrobatic stunts.

Mr Alvin Tan, NHB's assistant chief executive (policy and community), said the board was intrigued by the little-known story of the troupe.

Thanking the family for the photos, he said: "They provide us with rare visual insights into an early form of entertainment offered by the clan."

dansonc@sph.com.sg


This article was first published on MONTH DAY, 2016.
Get a copy of The Straits Times or go to straitstimes.com for more stories.

Image: 
Category: 
Publication Date: 
Sunday, June 19, 2016 - 17:00
Keywords: 
Send to mobile app: 
Source: 
Story Type: 
Others

Amputee's marathon effort brings cheer to daughter living with illness

$
0
0

Born without a left foot, Mr Shariff Abdullah had his left limb amputated below the knee in 2008 because of a skin infection.

Three months later, he took up running and, since then, has completed nearly 25 marathons, including the Boston Marathon.

But one race eludes him - the gruelling Tenzing-Hillary Everest Marathon. Known as the world's highest marathon, it begins at 5,184m above sea level close to Everest Base Camp in Nepal, before taking the runner though 42km of rough mountain trails.

The 47-year-old inspirational speaker, who called off his attempt last year because of the Nepal earthquake, tried again last month.

He trekked about 65km from Lukla in Nepal to the starting point of the marathon, but the tough conditions forced him to turn back.

He had hoped to raise $5,000 for the Club Rainbow charity through the run.

Still, his daughter could not be more proud.

"I feel happy that my father did this for me," said 16-year- old Nur Athirah Md Shariff Abdullah.

Since she was a baby, she has been living with liver cirrhosis, a disease that slowly prevents the liver from functioning properly.

Her condition can cause complications such as reduced oxygen in the blood, increased risk of infection, excessive bleeding and bruising and, in serious cases, kidney failure.

She had to take a year off from school recently due to her condition, and goes for monthly check-ups at KK Women's and Children's Hospital.

"Sometimes, I get scared when I have to go to the hospital, but I know that my father will always support me," said Athirah.

The Secondary 4 student from NorthLight School is also part of Club Rainbow, which helps children suffering from chronic and life-threatening illnesses.

To help Athirah, her family - including her mother Rozana Shariff, 54, and siblings Nur Anisaa, 21, and Nur Atiqah, 23 - makes sure there is always someone at home with her. Ms Atiqah is studying graphic design at the Nanyang Academy of Fine Arts (Nafa), while working part-time as a sales assistant.

She is close to Athirah and often takes time off from her busy schedule to take care of her when she falls ill. Athirah wants to follow in her big sister's footsteps and study at Nafa.

Mr Shariff said: "As a father, all I can do is to tell Athirah to be positive. I want her to be happy and to be able to do what she loves in the future. Although she is sick, and goes through so much hardship, she's just like any other teenager.

"She loves K-pop and Korean dramas and she has goals and dreams just like everyone else."

He was told originally that his daughter had leukaemia.

He said: "Knowing that this isn't the worst case for her, I already feel grateful. The best Father's Day present would simply be her love and happiness."

As for his attempt at the Everest marathon, he said: "My daughter was my biggest motivation. When I was up in the mountains, all I could think about was making her proud.

"Everything I do, I do for her."

sabrinaf@sph.com.sg


This article was first published on June 19, 2016.
Get a copy of The Straits Times or go to straitstimes.com for more stories.

Image: 
Category: 
Publication Date: 
Sunday, June 19, 2016 - 17:00
Keywords: 
Send to mobile app: 
Source: 
Story Type: 
Others

Grey areas in rule against 'foreign sponsorship' of Pink Dot

$
0
0

On June 4, Hong Lim Park played host to the Pink Dot rally, an annual event to support the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) community.

A few days after the event, on June 7, the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) issued a statement that said: "The Government's general position has always been that foreign entities should not interfere in our domestic issues, especially political issues or controversial social issues with political overtones. These are political, social or moral choices for Singaporeans to decide for ourselves. LGBT issues are one such example.

"This is why under the rules governing the use of the Speakers' Corner, for events like the Pink Dot, foreigners are not allowed to organise or speak at the events, or participate in demonstrations."

The statement has drawn a flurry of criticism online and in mainstream media. I must confess it got me a bit puzzled too.

First, when is a foreign entity foreign, and when is it resident?

This year, there were 18 corporate sponsors of Pink Dot.

They included Google, Barclays, Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan, Twitter, Facebook, Apple and Microsoft. Local sponsors included PS.Cafe and Cavenagh Law.

Pink Dot's organisers have stated that its sponsors are all registered and incorporated in Singapore.

As writer George Hwang put it pointedly in a commentary on The Online Citizen website: "You cannot consider MNCs' locally incorporated subsidiaries as 'Singaporean' for tax purposes and as alien for Speakers' Corner."

The issue of what is "foreign" when applied to Pink Dot sponsors is one grey area.

Another grey area is what constitutes "interference".

If sponsoring an event constitutes interference, then why do iconic summits organised by Singapore government agencies seek sponsorship from companies, including foreign ones?

The World Cities Summit and Singapore Energy Summit, for example, both have foreign sponsors.

In the cities summit, there is a discussion on whether culture matters in a city - a potentially sociopolitical issue.

The Singapore International Film Festival includes Swiss watch manufacturer IWC Schaffhausen as official time partner, and Marina Bay Sands, a subsidiary of Las Vegas Sands Corp, as present- ing sponsor.

Movies too can feature "controversial social issues with political overtones" - as we know from the Government's periodic moves to ban the public screening of films such as Tan Pin Pin's To Singapore with Love.

Will the ban on foreign sponsorship be extended beyond the pro-gay Pink Dot event, to film and other cultural events and even conferences on socio-political themes?

If not, why single out Pink Dot as an event that cannot get foreign sponsors?

Or perhaps the concern about Pink Dot is over law and order, given its rising popularity.

Attendance rose from 2,500 in its first year in 2009 to 28,000 last year.

Gay pride parades in Turkey and Russia, among others, have sparked riots, sometimes when anti-gay protesters clashed with gay pride marchers.

Last week's horrific mass shooting at a gay nightclub in Orlando highlights the potential for violence over this polarising issue.

But if law and order were a concern, MHA should say so explicitly and offer solutions that make sense from a security point of view, not restrict foreign sponsors.

In making the arguments above, I am merely trying to sketch out the anomalies and contradictions that ensue when one tries to apply the rule that "foreign entities should not interfere in our domestic issues, especially political issues or controversial social issues with political overtones".

To be sure, the rule on no foreign interference in domestic politics is not a new one.

I think most Singaporeans would support the line in the sand against foreign meddling drawn by this Govern- ment. I, for one, certainly do.

We want to evolve our political system at a pace we are comfortable with.

We do not want, or need, foreign democracy activists or human rights groups - some with dubious sources of funding - to push our tiny, fragile and extremely beloved island-nation down paths we will find hard to turn back from.

What is unsettling about the MHA statement is its addition of the category of "controversial social issues with political tones" to the list of off-limits issues for foreigners.

This definition is so widely written that it can become a trawler net to catch any issues that become embarrassing or inconvenient to the Government.

Already, activist group Aware has asked if its advocacy work - such as on workplace harassment, and support for single parents - will be affected by the rule.

Citing the latter issue, Aware executive director Corinna Lim wrote in The Straits Times' Forum page: "If a group objects to this and floods the Government with letters of complaint, would it become a 'controversial' social issue? Would any support we might have from foreign entities thus be deemed 'interference'?

"We are troubled by these potential implications of MHA's statement, which is ambiguous, leaves too much open to possibly arbitrary interpretation, and seems to go much further than previous pronouncements."

Ms Lim has a valid concern.

Singapore is at a transition point.

We have a Committee on the Future Economy to chart our economic blueprint.

We are rethinking our school and training model, to integrate in-school and after-school learning better.

We are concerned about the limits of our meritocracy system, and want to broaden our social safety net.

We should not close ourselves off, mentally or culturally, from the rich debates raging worldwide on many issues of social equity that have a bearing on the challenges we face.

These range from income inequality to disruptive technologies and the impact these will have on jobs and incomes, to the equity of health systems, and to the continued relevance of our industrial-model education system.

Many of these issues can all justifiably be described as "controversial social issues with political overtones".

What does keeping out foreign interference in these issues then mean?

No foreign sponsors , even from local subsidiaries of foreign firms? No foreign academics allowed to speak at a conference on these issues?

What is a "foreign academic" anyway? Does a foreign lecturer at a local university count?

There are many grey areas and questions arising from this loosely written rule against foreign interference in "controversial social issues with political overtones".

Keeping debate on difficult social issues entirely local hinders our ability to learn from the experiences of others.

An open, inclusive attitude can help us better reach a national consensus on difficult issues.

As for LGBT issues, they are certainly contentious and emotionally charged because they deal with people's freedom to love without breaking the law, and some religions have clear teachings against homosexual practices.

Debate on these issues will be fractious. They may even be "controversial social issues with political overtones".

Pro- and anti-gay camps may want to tap foreign sponsors and foreign groups (such as churches, universities, organisations) to talk to Singaporeans about such issues.

To be sure, it makes for a messier socio-political environment.

But do LGBT issues fall under the category of domestic politics that is core to Singapore's interests and identity as a nation, and from which foreign participation and sponsorship of events should be banned? I do not think so.

Singaporeans are a nationalistic lot.

We will support a government that ringfences our political system and domestic political contests from foreign interference.

But Singaporeans are also a probing, sceptical bunch.

If the Government wants to keep out foreigners from some debates and events, yet include them in others, we need more convincing on why, and how.

muihoong@sph.com.sg


This article was first published on June 19, 2016.
Get a copy of The Straits Times or go to straitstimes.com for more stories.

Image: 
Publication Date: 
Sunday, June 19, 2016 - 19:00
Keywords: 
Send to mobile app: 
Source: 
Story Type: 
Others

Will Govt's 'follow-the-money' formula work in changed landscape?

$
0
0

Does the Singapore Government work in mysterious ways?

You might think so going by two recent events which caught quite a few people by surprise.

First was the Home Affairs Ministry's statement earlier this month about foreign sponsorship of the annual Pink Dot event at Speakers' Corner in Hong Lim Park.

The ministry said it was taking steps to make sure foreign entities do not fund, support or influence these activities which involve members of the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) community.

The move made many see red as foreign companies have been sponsoring the annual gathering for several years without any problems, including the likes of Google, Apple and Facebook.

Then, there was the news that from next year, public servants will no longer be able to access the Internet through their work computers, but have to use their mobile devices or dedicated terminals to reduce the risk of hackers infiltrating the system and stealing or damaging information.

There was disbelief all round over what many saw as an over-reaction on the part of the authorities and it had to take the Prime Minister to explain why it was acting like a fortress under siege.

So, what to make of all this?

Has the Government suddenly turned its back on the world?

In fact, the issue is an old one for Singapore: how to operate an open economy with one of the most connections to the rest of the world, but still keep a tight lid on unwanted elements and what it considers to be undesirable influence detrimental to the country's well-being.

This has been a continuing challenge for the country because while its livelihood depends on it being open, the political instincts of the Government have tended towards management and control.

The easiest fights have been when the enemy was clearly foreign and evil.

When traffickers from the region, which is one of the world's largest producers of opium and heroin, threatened to make Singapore their transit point, the country introduced one of the toughest anti-drug laws in the world, imposing the death penalty on offenders.

This position has remained unchanged even in the face of mounting criticism from international human rights groups.

Singapore isn't afraid to be different on issues that threaten its security.

Sometimes, what's being kept out was at first welcomed with open arms - like foreign money looking for safe havens.

When it poured into the property market here in the 1990s, it was actively sought and encouraged because the plan then was to make the city attractive to the super wealthy.

But too much of a good thing can be hazardous to one's well-being.

When prices went through the roof, and a property bubble developed, measures were introduced to cool down the hot market.

They are still in place today.

Banking laws have had to be tightened to prevent money laundering through Singapore.

Indeed, the Monetary Authority of Singapore announced last week it wanted banks to tighten even more.

These examples show that the Government believes it is possible for Singapore to square the circle, operating a free and open economy while selectively shutting out unwelcome visitors.

The move to protect public service computers from foreign hackers is the latest variation of this thinking.

Expect the Government to hold the line even if it proves unpopular among civil servants.

But what if it is ideas it is attempting to shut out, like "political issues or controversial social issues with political overtones", which the MHA statement said were off limits to foreigners.

Will a people educated in some of the best universities in the world, connected to the World Wide Web in one of the most wired countries which is home to some of the leading lights of the digital economy, accept they need protection from foreign influence by a Government which believes it knows best?

The improbability of the challenge might deter some governments, but not the one here.

In fact, it has had much practice on this front, going back to the 1970s when it laid down the rule that foreign magazines and newspapers had no role to play in Singapore's domestic politics.

Those were bruising political battles with some of its fiercest critics, including publications like Time magazine, the Asian Wall Street Journal and the Economist.

One by one, though, they were forced into submission, and the policy was entrenched.

Can the same approach work today, even if the world - and Singapore - has changed irrevocably?

There is one unspoken strategy the Government has used to much effect at every encounter: Follow the money.

Whether it's the foreign media, alternative news websites, or LGBT causes, it believes that if it is able to trace the source of their funding and shut or squeeze it, even the toughest will eventually comply.

During its fights with the foreign media, it restricted the circulation of offending publications, hurting their pockets.

In the more recent moves to regulate online media, it required those of a certain size to declare their funding sources, with financial penalties for offenders.

In clamping down on foreign funding of LGBT events, it is following the same script, going where the money trail leads.

End of story?

For these specific battles, I have no doubt the Government will prevail, as it has repeatedly done.

But it will be a very narrow victory because the foreign ideas that have had the biggest impact on Singaporeans, for better or worse, have long stormed the Singapore gates.

The most powerful ideas - and they mostly originated outside - are neither overtly political nor controversial.

They simply change fundamentally the way people think and, in doing so, disrupt and destroy the old way.

The Internet and social media overturned traditional concepts of hierarchy and attitudes towards authority.

Disruptive technologies like Google and Facebook revolutionised the media industry, making it impossible for governments to control information.

Indeed, it is because these ideas have changed the world that causes like those associated with the LGBT community have gained so much traction worldwide, including in Singapore.

Politics might remain off limits to foreigners.

But the politics itself has already changed.

hanfk@sph.com.sg

Image: 
Publication Date: 
Sunday, June 19, 2016 - 19:00
Send to mobile app: 
Source: 
Story Type: 
Others

'Ang Moh' explains why people hate Singapore

$
0
0

Haters gonna hate.

SINGAPORE - An 'Ang Moh' who has been staying in Singapore for 10 years gave his take on 'Why do people hate Singapore?' on Saturday (June 18), attracting nearly 100,000 views on question-and-answer website Quora within 24 hours.

As a 'foreign talent', Theodore Shawcross described Singapore as 'the closest you can get to a near perfectly run country'.

"I'm saying this objectively, because amid all the freedom, the welfare, the 'quality of life' that Singaporeans seem to admire about Scandinavian countries, or for some odd reason, the US and the UK, I sincerely doubt that any person with the desire to be in a competitive, fast-paced, ultra modern, yet clean, safe and economically solvent country would have any other options other than Singapore," Mr Shawcross wrote.

In his 2,064 -word answer, Mr Shawcross touched on the common sore points by detractors of Singapore, such as freedom of speech, cost of living and the cost of cars.

While largely praising Singapore for its efforts to address these issues, Mr Shawcross noted that there are still areas for improvement, such as laws against homosexuality.

Mr Shawcross, who is an economist, noted that many of the angst against Singapore are typical in many modern metropolitan cities.

"People need to understand one thing, if you want to demand the government to do something about your problems, please make sure you've done enough academic research about whether or not your problems are essential problems, or are they problems that are just characteristic of a modern metropolitan city, for if they are, there's really no solution to many of those problems," he wrote.

Here is his speech in full:

I've read all the answers here and I'd just like to give my opinion on this, as a "foreign talent" as an "angmoh" and as someone who grew up in England, eventually moved to the US for my PhD, and then chose to raise my family in Singapore.

As a person who grew up in the west, there's nothing that gives more credence to the phrase "the grass is greener on the other side" than when a caucasian chooses to move to a predominantly asian country.

It gives me great pride to say that I could somehow travel 10 years back in time to that moment I made this decision to move to Singapore with my wife and 5 month old boy, I will choose Singapore again in a heartbeat.

Singapore is an amazing country.

That sentence is perhaps more of an understatement than any of the understatements in history, because although many Singaporeans like to rant about its imperfections, Singapore is the closest you can get to a near perfectly run country.

I'm saying this objectively, because amid all the freedom, the welfare, the "quality of life" that Singaporeans seem to admire about Scandinavian countries, or for some odd reason, the US and the UK, I sincerely doubt that any person with the desire to be in a competitive, fast-paced, ultra modern, yet clean, safe and economically solvent country would have any other options other than Singapore.

Singapore has lived up to all my expectations of enabling my children to receive a world leading education, to grow up in a country bereft of violence, misconduct and disorder, and enabling me to work alongside one of the most highly educated and skilled pool of talent that happens to speak in my native tongue, to enable my wife and I to mingle with people from all around the world in a tight knit environment, to live in an essentially equal country without overt racism because to be Singaporean is to accept that anyone can be Singaporean, regardless or race and religion, now that's priceless.

The US has always claimed to be an inclusive country where people of different walks of life can live freely and ironically "safely", it might be a surprise to some folks because they never really found out how to get that done.

Racial Equality

This country has its flaws, but I'm an economist, therefore I know firsthand that whatever you choose, there is always going to be something you give up. Freedom of speech is something that has become very controversial in recent Singaporean history given the persecution that Amos Yee had to face by posting a seemingly "harmless" video.

It has become a theme now that young Singaporeans are becoming increasingly enchanted with Western ideas of freedom and yet they've not actually lived in those countries long enough to get an idea of what that sort of freedom is about.

Singapore is undoubtedly multiracial, and to maintain this heterogeneity comes at a huge price, it's a price that the founders of this country felt it was worth paying, and it did pay off.

I come from a country riddled with hate crime. Although I've never really experienced it firsthand on the tube or on buses, but everyone in England will always have that friend with a story to tell about racial conflict in public places.

I've also lived for more than half a decade in the US, essentially a country still deeply ensconced in racial tensions, especially in southern states. Singapore is a country that has essentially solved that problem.

Cost of Living

I understand through volunteer work and community service in Singapore that there are people choking under the increased stress that Singapore is becoming too expensive for the poor.

I don't like to diss this as a problem we cannot solve, but I would say that it is a very difficult problem to solve. Singapore is an entrepôt nation, add that to the fact that it is one of the most densely populated modern metropolises in the world. Being born in this country has its disadvantages if you weren't born into a well-to-do family, I get that.

To keep any economy stable, solvent, and growing, there will be positive selection from other countries, it's inevitable. The rich, the highly qualified, the highly skilled will always find a reason to get their asses to this island. I'm a living breathing example of that.

People will always move to the place, the job, the field or the country they feel they can be most productive in, it's just economics. Now the only way the government can solve this problem, is to increase spending in welfare, how? Well the only way is to increase taxes isn't it?

But wait, isn't the only thing keeping Singapore such an attractive location for startup businesses and highly skilled professionals is the relatively low taxes?

Singapore is too small a country to be dilly-dallying, that I can assure you. It needs to stay competitive, it needs to keep growing, otherwise it wouldn't last long, and I do mean, the country will crumble if its economy falters.

There are many things keeping this country economically strong, many components, many attributes, I believe the current government understands that and it's difficult to compromise those components to improve the cost of living.

The cost of living of any metropolitan city is bound to be high, Google the rent on flats in New York, or London, or Tokyo, or Sydney, and I'll find something to keep your jaws from dropping. With the exception of Tokyo and maybe Sydney, most of the capital cities in the world are filthy, dangerous, crime-infested and their public transport systems are failing ALL THE TIME. And I do mean "all the time", not the once a month kind of deal that we have to deal with SMRT.

I will not in a million years expect Singapore to be any less expensive to live in than any of these cities, and yet it holds up pretty well.

Singapore can be affordable, which is one of the great triumphs of the Singaporean government, which is to make relatively high quality public housing available and provide financial aids to afford them.

It's impossible to go out for a proper meal in London without having to spend more than 50 SGD on your meal, whereas I can take a train to any shopping mall with a food court and spend less than 10 SGD on a full meal, sitting in clean seats and an air-conditioned environment.

Singapore has a lot to give, and I can imagine being in the shoes of the government, because the people never seem to be satisfied with what they have. It's a really tough job.

Cost of Cars

Something that's linked quite closely to the Singaporean notion of "quality of life" is car ownership.

Yes cars are bloody expensive in Singapore, more expensive than any other country perhaps. The government seeks to solve this problem through making public transport a viable option, by constant expanding their coverage and making it very affordable. Barring the relatively infrequent breakdowns.

In America car ownership would be something of a necessity, because apart from it being virtually impossible to travel without having a car.

I drove an hour from where I lived to the Stanford campus every day for 5 years. However, you can only imagine the traffic congestion I have to deal with on the I-80 every day.

Making cars affordable in Singapore is just going to make the roads more congested, at which point it's not make sense to own a car anymore.

Freedom of Expression

I believe I touched a little on this topic, so now I'm going to clarify that freedom of expression has never meant freedom to say anything you want without consequences.

You may think there is freedom in just about any modern developed country so why can't Singapore have it, but you have to also take in account the laws that these countries have against racism such as the Crime and Disorder Act in Britain.

There is absolutely no country in which you can just say anything to incite violence, disorder, or possibly terrorism without being persecuted. The US is a very unique situation wherein everyone can practically say anything they want without being held for trial, but that doesn't mean you can defame anyone you like without being sued.

Yes, the US probably has the freedom of expression that most young, naive Singaporeans are asking for, but look at the state of the country, and look how they were able to regulate racism.

I really wonder if that is what Singaporeans want, the freedom to go on any MRT train and call an Indian or a Malay person out based on the colour of their skin. This toxic right belittles the very equality that the founding fathers of this country fought for.

I thought Singapore left Malaysia because they weren't able to promise the sort of racial equality that Lee Kuan Yew had asked for. People may argue that this wouldn't happen, and that education is the only solution to racial tolerance, but how many people in Singapore are actually educated to the level that would make them impervious to racial hate?

The last I checked, the leader of the Ku Klux Klan, David Duke is a university graduate. Humans cannot be realistically be given the ability to run their mouths in hopes that education can be an effective restrictor, because it is obviously not. Only the law can protect the rights of the people from being offended, racially or religiously.

The question on whether the right of being protected from emotional harm or the right to be able to express our ideas freely has an obvious answer. People want to be able to say what they want, but they aren't willing to bear the consequences that being emotionally fragile human beings, violence is just one step away from offensive remarks with racial or religious undertones.

This brings us to the question of "is prevention better than cure". Do we want to let loose the darkest sides of our psyches in hopes that Singapore will continue to be an inclusive society?

I'm not going to sugarcoat the bad things about Singapore, because there are some pretty strict laws that must be changed, like laws against homosexuality, which I think will, in time, be abolished.

But people need to understand one thing, if you want to demand the government to do something about your problems, please make sure you've done enough academic research about whether or not your problems are essential problems, or are they problems that are just characteristic of a modern metropolitan city, for if they are, there's really no solution to many of those problems.

No country has been able to keep housing affordable in their capital city relatively to their suburban or rural areas. Singapore has no suburban areas, the closest thing we have to a countryside is Malaysia, where houses are by the Singaporean definition, affordable and cheap.

As I have said about freedom of expression, there's a huge price we have to pay for it. Not everyone is educated, not everyone is inherently tolerant. If we allow that to happen, may I refer you to the countless of videos on UK, US and Aussie racism that happened regardless of the laws imposed against racial remarks in the UK and Australia. If Singapore starts to lax its laws against freedom of expression then the fundamentals of what made this country great will crumble.

So why do people hate Singapore you ask? Well my only answer is blame Hollywood, and blame ignorance. Young people are a pain in the a**, we've all been through that phase. They just need to grow up and realise that you cannot always get what you want, you should not always get what you want.

Singapore is in good hands, and I'm proud to stay on, contribute to the economy, create jobs for Singaporeans, do community and volunteer work, all in the name of preserving my choice to come live here.

Majulah Singapura.

Image: 
Category: 
Publication Date: 
Sunday, June 19, 2016 - 16:13
Send to mobile app: 
Source: 
Rotator Image: 
Story Type: 
Rewritten Story

Brexit on minds of expats in Singapore too

Composer of futuristic NDP 2016 theme song "ready to be judged"

$
0
0

SINGAPORE - After 50 years of nationhood, how do you celebrate the next 50 years?

Keeping in line with this year's National Day Parade's (NDP 2016) futuristic concept, a theme song sung by local band 53A was unveiled on Sunday (June 19).

The song is entitled 'Tomorow's Here Today', and producing it took four months from start to finish, with over 400 performers and crew to film the video, ChannelNews Asia reported.

Filmed in 'one-shot' in a 6,500 square metre hall at BIGBOX mall in Jurong East, the continuous technique allows a seamless viewing of the video in one take.

Green screens were used for the video to allow the backdrop to be digitally altered, keeping in line with the technologically advanced futuristic concept.

"What we are going to do actually in the green screen, the backdrops - it's not going to be photo-real(istic). Instead what we are doing is something that is hand drawn. We'll see hand drawn structures of Singapore," Huang Junxiang, the film producer told the media.

"So you'll see the iconic shophouses of Singapore, you'll see the Esplanade and other elements depicted around. So we wanted to create a tapestry that surrounds the performers, which emphasises the unity we possess as Singapore to celebrate NDP," added Mr Huang, 27.

Don Richmond, who is the composer for the song, expressed his relief at composing a song about the future, and not the past 50 years.

"I think with Dick (Lee, composer of NDP 2015 Theme Song), he obviously had a lot on his shoulders to carry. I feel that maybe that was kind of like I was lucky enough to not have that kind of pressure," said Mr Richmond, 39, in a ChannelNews Asia report.

Explaining the decision to pick 53A, Mr Richmond said that the band's youthful spirit and growth over the years, as well as their multiracial setup were the deciding factors.

The band is a familiar fixture at nightspots such as Hive by Wala Wala and Timbre Substation, The Straits Times reported.

As with all new NDP songs, Mr Richmond is ready for any flak that follows.

"I'm here. I'm ready to be judged. I honestly feel the worst thing that you can do is try to think that you have to please everyone," said Mr Richmond, The Straits Times reported.

grongloh@sph.com.sg

OTHER NDP 2016 STORIES:

- NDP 2016 stories

- NDP 2016 to cost $39.4m, no Red Lions for safety reasons

- 2016 National Day Parade's funpack gets digital

Image: 
Category: 
Publication Date: 
Sunday, June 19, 2016 - 19:12
Keywords: 
Send to mobile app: 
Source: 
Rotator Image: 
video embed code: 
<iframe width="100%" height="360px" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/rwoJuT76nb8" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
Video Media: 
Other Video Media
Story Type: 
Rewritten Story

Starbucks customer gives unsold food to foreign workers

$
0
0

Singapore - Some foreign workers doing road works near Singapore Polytechnic had a pleasant surprise when they were plied with afternoon treats of pastries, muffins and sandwiches last Saturday (June 18).

This was all thanks to Starbucks coffee chain and one of its customers.

Ms Dipa Swaminathan, 44, was buying coffee at a Starbucks outlet at the polytechnic near Clementi when she saw staff removing unsold food while preparing to close the store at 4pm.

Just before they were about to throw away "perfectly good-quality food", Ms Dipa asked them whether she could distribute the food to the workers she had seen doing road work nearby. The staff agreed and packed the food in bags.

In a Facebook post, Ms Dipa said: "They handed me two bags of pastries, muffins and sandwiches (all very kindly warmed up) and I was lucky enough to find workers right down the road. The workers were delighted, and as I turned back after handing them the food I saw them all happily snacking, sitting on the pavement."

Ms Dipa, who wrote on a Facebook page called Itsrainingraincoats, said she hopes to distribute unsold food items from Starbucks every Saturday if she could. She also appeals to others to do the same to reduce food waste while helping less-privileged communities.

It might just inspire some to join her in the act judging from the tremendous response to her post. It has garnered 10,000 reactions and 1,600 shares since last Saturday.

Read also: Food wastage on the rise, but F&B companies not keen to donate





The Singapore permanent resident told Today that she has been thinking about distributing unsold food to migrant workers on a larger scale for some time, and the opportunity last Saturday gave her more willpower to pursue the plan.

Ms Dipa, who is the founder of an initiative which distributes rain coats to migrant workers, told Today: "I would like to explore ways to do this more regularly, on a more institutional level."



Starbucks in America had started the ball rolling in March when it decided to donate all of its leftover prepared meals to food banks in a new initiative.

The coffee giant teamed up with the Food Donation Connection (FDC) and Feeding America, which pick up the food at 7,600 Starbucks locations and redistribute it.

Starbucks has been working with the FDC since 2010 to donate leftover pastries, but has added properly maintained perishable food to the end-of-day pick up.

Starbucks brand manager Jane Maly had said in a press statement: "We focused on maintaining the temperature, texture and flavor of the surplus food, so when it reached a person in need, they could safely enjoy it."

The chain estimates it will be able to contribute almost 5 million meals at the end of its first year of the programme.

chenj@sph.com.sg

Read also: Food Bank Singapore distributes donated food to the needy

Image: 
Category: 
Publication Date: 
Monday, June 20, 2016 - 12:48
Send to mobile app: 
Source: 
Rotator Headline: 
Foreign workers enjoy unsold Starbucks food a customer took for them
Rotator Image: 
Story Type: 
Rewritten Story

Screening ends at block where TB cases were found

$
0
0

About 230 people have been screened for tuberculosis at an Ang Mo Kio block where a cluster of multi-drug-resistant TB cases was identified recently.

The Ministry of Health (MOH), giving an update at the end of its on-site TB screening at the void deck, said that the residents and former residents had been tested at Block 203, in Ang Mo Kio Avenue 3, since screening started last Thursday.

Of these, nine said they had a cough for more than three weeks, and were referred to Tan Tock Seng Hospital's TB Control Unit for further tests. Another 13 aged five and below were given screening appointments at the unit as the tests are different for young children.

About 350 people live in the block.

MOH said that it expects to detect some cases of latent TB - when a person has TB bacteria in his body but there are no symptoms, as such infections are not uncommon in the general population.

These may not be related to the cluster.

In what the ministry said was a "highly unusual occurrence", six residents in the block were diagnosed with the same strain of multi-drug-resistant TB over a four-year period.

MOH added that its officers and grassroots volunteers had reached out to more than 80 per cent of households in the 160-unit block by going door to door. Those tested will get their screening results within two weeks.

The ministry added that it has made arrangements for residents and former residents who lived in the block from July 2011 to be screened free of charge at any Sata CommHealth clinic until the end of the month. After June 30, they may make an appointment to be screened at the Tan Tock Seng Hospital's TB Control Unit.


This article was first published on Jun 20, 2016.
Get a copy of The Straits Times or go to straitstimes.com for more stories.

Image: 
Publication Date: 
Monday, June 20, 2016 - 14:30
Send to mobile app: 
Source: 
Story Type: 
Others

1.54 million Singaporeans to get $890 million of GST vouchers and Medisave top-ups

$
0
0

SINGAPORE - 1.54 million Singaporeans will receive GST Vouchers (GSTV), Medisave top-ups among other benefits as part of the Budget announced by the Ministry of Finance (MOF) today (June 20).

About 1.3 million Singaporeans will receive up to $300 of GSTV in cash, while an additional $200 will be given to households as a one-off GSTV cash payment - a total of $500, which will disbursed in two payments in August and November this year.

425,000 Singaporeans aged 65 and above will also receive a GSTV payment of up to $450 in their Medisave accounts. Additionally, Singaporeans born on or before December 31, 1959, who do not receive Pioneer Generation (PG) benefits, will receive a Medisave top-up of up to $200 each year till 2018. 

The Pioneer Generation (PG) will also receive their Medisave top-ups of $200 to $800 this year.

Eligible Singaporeans will receive a letter informing them of their benefits by July 1. Citizens are encouraged to sign for SMS notifications at the GSTV website.

For more information, visit the Singapore Budget website.

prabukm@sph.com.sg

Image: 
Category: 
Publication Date: 
Monday, June 20, 2016 - 12:52
Send to mobile app: 
Source: 
Rotator Image: 
Story Type: 
Rewritten Story

Underwater World a regular target of marine park critics

$
0
0

A persistent conundrum in nature conservation is finding a balance between breeding animals in captivity to prevent extinction and enhance public awareness, and channelling resources to protect them within their natural habitats.

The issue has been thrust into the spotlight again with the closure this coming Sunday of the 25-year-old Underwater World Singapore (UWS). The lease on its premises nears expiry and it faces stiff competition from the Marine Life Park and Dolphin Island at Resorts World Sentosa. UWS was the largest tropical fish oceanarium in Asia when it opened in 1991.

Conservation and animal welfare groups have criticised it for catching dolphins in the wild instead of sourcing ones bred in captivity, keeping animals in bad condition and forcing them to perform unnatural acts.

But UWS managers said in 2009 that their successful breeding of dolphins and other species indicated that the animals were well taken care of and helped to maintain a diverse gene pool for the viability of the species.

An Indo-Pacific humpbacked dolphin, or pink dolphin, was born UWS in 2002, which the attraction said was the world's first recorded captive birth of the species.

The oceanarium has also successfully bred about 15 species of fish, including sharks, some of which had not been bred elsewhere.

Then curatorial director Bruce Mackay said in 2001 that captive breeding saves these species from being taken from the wild for commercial trade.

In 2010, UWS released 18 critically endangered hawksbill turtles, eight of them with satellite tracking devices to study their migratory behaviour in collaboration with organisations in Japan and the United States.

However, photojournalist and activist Debby Ng, who founded local marine protection group Hantu Blog in 2003, said: "Success in captive breeding and release alone are not conclusive measures of conservation success." She added that long-term monitoring and management are necessary to determine whether the efforts have helped wild populations persist.

"Zoos and oceanariums can provide a crucial service if they teach respect for nature and foster endearment of the wild."

Outreach activities are part of the mix at UWS, such as holiday programmes in which children attend educational talks about marine life and spend the night in UWS' underwater tunnel sleeping with the fish.

UWS has also given stranded wildlife a home. Gracie the dugong was taken in in 1998 after its mother drowned off Pulau Ubin. Gracie lived at UWS until 2014, when it died of an acute digestive disorder.

But UWS still faced controversies. In 2004, the Animal Concerns Research and Education Society discovered that the oceanarium's six dolphins had been originally caught in the wild rather than bred in captivity as previously recorded, and called for them to be set free.

The Agri-Food and Veterinary Authority (AVA), however, clarified that as the dolphins had already been in captivity for at least three years in a Thai marine park prior to coming to Singapore, UWS could legally keep them.

In 2014, animal welfare and conservation groups Wildlife Watcher (Singapore) and Sea Shepherd Conservation Society reported that the dolphins were kept in rusty enclosures, had skin diseases, were made to perform unnatural acts and were exposed to loud music.

But an inspection by the AVA found the dolphins to be in a "satisfactory" condition. A pink dolphin was born there that year.

Mr Stephen Beng, chairman of the marine conservation group of the Nature Society (Singapore), said that the question remains of the "moral acceptability of keeping animals in captivity, especially those with larger ranges and complex social structures" such as dolphins.

Ms Ng noted that people can admire such animals in their natural habitats, even in Singapore.

In fact, there have been several recent sightings of wild pink dolphins in Singapore waters.

She added that some aquariums in the United States actually offer field trips to observe animals in the wild.

 


This article was first published on Jun 20, 2016.
Get a copy of The Straits Times or go to straitstimes.com for more stories.

Image: 
Category: 
Publication Date: 
Monday, June 20, 2016 - 15:30
Keywords: 
Send to mobile app: 
Source: 
Story Type: 
Others

Parents petition for return of exam scripts

$
0
0

An examination board's policy of not returning exam answer sheets has come under scrutiny, with close to 1,200 people signing an online petition calling for this practice to be reviewed.

Housewife Sreevidya Kompella, 43, started the petition to the Board for Teaching and Testing of South Asian Languages (BTTSAL) about a month ago.

Set up in 2003, it standardises the teaching and testing of five non-Tamil Indian languages: Bengali, Hindi, Gujarati, Punjabi and Urdu. It also conducts the semestral examinations for these languages for students from Primary 3 to junior college, but does not oversee national exams.

The languages are recognised by the Education Ministry here as mother tongue languages. There are about 8,900 students enrolled in these language classes, taught by about 420 teachers.

While students can usually bring home exam answer sheets for subjects such as English, maths and science after their papers have been marked - unless they are for national examinations like the O levels - they are unable to do so for these language subjects, the petition stated.

Ms Kompella, whose Primary 5 son is taking Hindi as a mother tongue at Telok Kurau Primary School, said this prevents students and parents from getting comprehensive feedback on their performance in the subject.

"It is not an issue about challenging the marks awarded to students, but about helping them to do better next time. For example, some of my son's science answers were marked partially wrong and it was only after reviewing them and discussing with his teacher that we understood the level of precision and correct usage of technical terms that the school was looking for," said Ms Kompella, who first approached the board about this issue last October.

Mr Mohammed Shahidul Islam, who has two children aged 11 and 15 studying Bengali, agreed.

"We need to see the exam papers to be able to catch their mistakes," said the 48-year-old, who owns an engineering business.

BTTSAL works with seven community groups, including the Hindi Society (Singapore) and the Urdu Development Society (Singapore). The groups are responsible for the hiring, training and remuneration of their teachers. It was reported in 2009 that the BTTSAL receives an annual grant of $1.5 million from the Government.

In response to queries from The Straits Times, the board said it has a policy of not returning the examination scripts because of the "short turnaround time" for marking and reviewing the scripts, and processing the marks. But it did not say why the papers could not be returned after the marks have been processed.

Currently, students can review their marked exam scripts at six exam centres during a two-hour session. The board said: "At this session, students' queries are addressed in detail and marking errors rectified, if any."

It added that students are given a fair chance to learn from their mistakes as the board gives a "detailed" performance summary, which provides information on students' performance in every component of the paper, to parents and teachers.

But parents said the summaries and feedback sessions are inadequate.

Training manager Anita Uppal, 39, whose two sons take Hindi as a mother tongue at St Stephen's School, said: "My child said that during the feedback session, he adds up the marks to make sure they are correct, and that the teacher goes through some, but not all, of the questions.

"He would prefer to bring the paper home so that we could go through it with him at his pace."

The board has contacted Ms Kompella and said it will meet her for a discussion soon. She hopes the board can consider alternatives.

"I understand that there are logistical challenges, but there are some solutions that can be worked out, such as using technology."


This article was first published on Jun 20, 2016.
Get a copy of The Straits Times or go to straitstimes.com for more stories.

Image: 
Publication Date: 
Monday, June 20, 2016 - 16:30
Keywords: 
Send to mobile app: 
Source: 
Story Type: 
Others
Viewing all 5962 articles
Browse latest View live


Latest Images